Home Depot and Lowe’s are secretly feeding your data to law enforcement and strangers

An investigative report reveals that Flock Safety surveillance cameras at 173+ Lowe’s locations are secretly capturing license plates and feeding the data to police, government and hackers.
Home Depot and Lowe’s, two of the country’s most popular home improvement stores, are contributing to the massive surveillance dragnet coordinated by Flock Spy cameras. Do customers know that these stores are collecting their data and sharing it indiscriminately? Probably not. Have these companies given thought to how this data might put their customers in danger, whether it’s cops stalking their exes or aggressive ICE agents targeting yard workers? Probably not. If these companies want customers to feel safe in their homes, then they should make sure they’re also safe where they buy their supplies.”
What Lowe’s Customers Need to Know
Your license plate, vehicle description, and visit timestamp were captured and uploaded to a cloud database.
That data is searchable by law enforcement agencies across the country — potentially including ICE, Border Patrol, and agencies that have used the system to track protesters, target ethnic minorities, and surveil reproductive healthcare patients.
Flock’s cameras have a documented 10% state misidentification rate. Innocent people — disproportionately Black Americans — have been detained at gunpoint, handcuffed, and forced to the ground because of these errors.
Police officers have used this same system to stalk ex-partners, monitor spouses, and harass citizens with no connection to criminal investigations.
Every time you pull into a Lowe’s parking lot, you are not just a customer. You are a data point in a $7.5 billion surveillance machine funded by Andreessen Horowitz and operated without your knowledge or consent.
Lowe’s, one of the country’s most popular home improvement stores, is contributing to the massive surveillance dragnet coordinated by Flock Spy Camera. Do customers know that these stores are collecting their data and sharing it indiscriminately? Probably not. Have these companies given thought to how this data might put their customers in danger, whether it’s cops stalking their exes or aggressive ICE agents targeting yard workers? Probably not. If Lowe’s wants customers to feel safe in their homes, then they should make sure they’re also safe where they buy their supplies.
Americans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras
Brian Merchant, writing for Blood in the Machine, reports that people across the United States are dismantling and destroying Flock surveillance cameras amid rising public anger over license plate readers that aid U.S. immigration authorities and deportations.
Flock is the Atlanta-based surveillance startup valued at $7.5 billion a year ago and a maker of license plate readers. It has faced criticism for allowing federal authorities access to its massive network of nationwide license plate readers and databases at a time when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is increasingly relying on data to raid communities as part of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown.
Flock cameras allow authorities to track where people go and when by capturing license plate photos from thousands of cameras across the United States. Flock claims it doesn’t share data with ICE directly, but reports show that local police have shared their own access to Flock cameras and its databases with federal authorities.
While some communities are calling on their cities to end their contracts with Flock, others are taking matters into their own hands.
Merchant reports instances of broken and smashed Flock cameras in La Mesa, California, just weeks after the city council approved the continuation of Flock cameras deployed in the city, despite a clear majority of attendees favoring their shutdown. A local report cited strong opposition to the surveillance technology, with residents raising privacy concerns.
Other cases of vandalism have stretched from California and Connecticut to Illinois and Virginia. In Oregon, six license plate-scanning cameras on poles were cut down, and at least one was spray-painted. A note left at the base of the severed poles said, “Hahaha get wrecked ya surveilling fucks,” reports Merchant.
According to DeFlock, a project aimed at mapping license plate readers, there are close to 80,000 cameras across the United States. Dozens of cities have so far rejected the use of Flock’s cameras, and some police departments have since blocked federal authorities from using their resources.
A Flock spokesperson did not say, when reached by TechCrunch, whether the company keeps track of how many cameras have been destroyed since deployment.
Flock Cameras in Brazos County
Police address growing network of Flock Safety cameras across Brazos County
Police say the cameras capture vehicle data used to track down suspects in active investigations.
BRAZOS COUNTY- More than 30 cameras are quietly watching the roads of Bryan-College Station, scanning license plates, logging vehicle details, and helping police solve murders. Not everyone is comfortable with that.
How Flock cameras work
Flock Safety builds these devices, best known as Flock cameras, and they work differently from standard stoplight cameras. They are automatic license plate readers that can operate independently or be mounted to existing city infrastructure. Flock not only photographs the rear of passing vehicles to capture license plate numbers, but it also records the vehicle’s make, model, and defining features.
“Markings, dents, stickers, anything like that used for criminal investigations,” College Station Police Department Public Information Officer David Simmons listed.
Investigators can search the Flock database by vehicle features, helping link cars to thefts, murders, and missing persons cases. Bryan Police Department Public Information Officer Seth Waller said the technology has already contributed to solving cases locally.
“One specific one that I can talk about is the 2022 murder of Miss Perry, who was an Uber driver, and a Flock hit on that vehicle that was stolen from her down in Del Rio,” Waller explained. “That was crucial in helping solve the murder case for us here at Bryan.”
More cameras bring privacy concerns
Not everyone supports the expanding camera network. Bob Smentana, a member of the group DeFlock, said the technology raises concerns about privacy and the amount of data being collected.
“I think it’s not something that should be allowed to happen. And I think the only solution here is not to collect that data. I think it’s too dangerous for anybody to have,” Smentana said.
DeFlock is a national organization that encourages communities to remove the cameras or limit their abilities. Members of DeFlock and their supporters say Flock cameras create “mass surveillance” by compiling video of where vehicles travel over time. Many are concerned about how long the data is stored and who ultimately has access to it.
“I don’t think that Flock or their management have any malice; I think they believe themselves to be working for the good guys and doing the right thing,” Smentana said. “I think it would do them well to pick up a history book.”
Data storage and who can access it
Law enforcement officials say the cameras serve a public safety purpose and that all collected data is protected.
“Flock isn’t taking any of that data and selling it,” Simmons said. “We’re not looking at trying to see what your locations are, the everyday citizen. We are truly trying to utilize this technology to protect our communities.”
Only Brazos County law enforcement agencies have access to data recorded from the Flock cameras they have installed. The system automatically deletes any data not connected to an active investigation after 30 days.
“We own the cameras, we own that data,” Waller said. “Data is stored for 30 days, and after 30 days, if there’s not a search for that information, it’s gone.”
Retailers like Lowe’s and Home Depot have installed Flock cameras in their parking lots to reduce crime. These businesses can choose to share that data with law enforcement, but do not always do so.
“You’ll see a lot of Home Depots, Lowes, lots of retail businesses can purchase Flock cameras, and then they choose to share that,” Simmons said. “They can share it statewide to each agency but it’s an option they don’t have to share.”
Flock network expected to expand
More than 30 Flock cameras are now installed across Bryan and College Station, and police say the network will keep growing.
“It’s honestly just a huge blessing that we have the support of our city councils to be able to purchase this technology,” Waller said. “They help solve crime and produce the information and investigative tools that we need so as long as that is happening, our city is going to be there to support us and what we need to get those cameras and help solve crime.”
This week, the Bryan City Council approved installing five additional cameras on Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT)-maintained roadways, and College Station is following suit.
Officer Simmons said College Station is currently installing additional cameras across the city.
“It’s going to expand,” Simmons said. “I think we currently have three, and we have a lot more coming.”
With more Flock cameras on the way, the twin cities want to make it clear: crime is not welcome in Aggieland.
“Our goal is always going to be the same, and that’s to hold people accountable for their actions,” Simmons added.